I recommend minor revision

WebApr 9, 2024 · The Editorial Office is waiting for your revised manuscript. As an author, this manuscript status means that it’s time to review your manuscript and edit it using the comments provided. We expect to receive revisions within 5 days (for minor revisions) or within 10 days (for major revisions). This is inclusive of weekends and holidays. WebNov 27, 2024 · I have submitted my manuscript to one of the peer-reviewed journals of chemistry and the decision was 'recommended for publication subject to minor revision'. I …

What Does My MDPI Manuscript Status Mean? - MDPI Blog

WebReviewer #I recommended publication; Reviewer #2 suggested 5 or 6 major modifications, any one of which would require essentially the researching and writing of another paper, and 2 or 3 years of ... WebNov 21, 2024 · After two months, I received minor revision as the decision. The statement was: ‘Your paper was found acceptable pending revision.’ I submitted the revised version, and now, the status is Under Review. What does this mean? And normally how long does this round of review take? Kind regards. Asked on 21 Nov, 2024 Answer Follow this Question earth live nasa https://rimguardexpress.com

What is the meaning of the Under Review status for a minor revision …

WebApr 6, 2024 · I recommend minor revisions after addressing the few comments below. Overall, some confusion still persists regarding their O2 threshold used to define hypoxia. In their response, they explain that they considered 20 M as a upper threshold below which denitrification and anammox occurs, i.e., fixed nitrogen is transformed to N2. ... WebAddress all points raised by the editor and reviewers. Describe the major revisions to your manuscript in your response letter followed by point-by-point responses to the comments … Web1. The work lacks scientific merit - the manuscript does not make any significant improvement to the intended field of research. 2. Personal biases are elevated above … earth live cam myrtle beach

Decision types on journal articles - Publishing Support

Category:Step by Step Guide to Reviewing a Manuscript Wiley

Tags:I recommend minor revision

I recommend minor revision

Response times for Exams requiring Sonographer review …

WebCommon reasons for a ‘minor revisions’ decision. There are six common reasons for a ‘minor revisions’ decision: The literature review can benefit from additional sources: As a reviewer with expertise on the topic of the manuscript, you may be aware of a recent publication or discussion that the authors do not include yet. The relevance and originality … WebRelated to Response times for Exams requiring Sonographer review. Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.. Peer Review …

I recommend minor revision

Did you know?

WebHowever, my supervisor told me several times when submitting papers that there's no such thing as minor revisions anymore and everyone seems to always say major just because they can. 2 of my papers came back as major revisions but it took maybe 2 hours of editing grammer and spelling to fix it. WebAug 10, 2024 · Usually, you would see “Minor Revisions Required” or “Major Revisions Required” if the journal wants you to revise your manuscript to address specific concerns …

WebAccept with Minor Revision This is for manuscripts with minor issues and you don’t need to see the revision before the manuscript is accepted. The AE will check if all the comments are addressed. Sample reviewer comments: “ This paper proposes a novel approach towards solving the reconstruction problem of motion corrupted fetal MRI. WebApr 13, 2024 · Accept with minor revisions ... Make the recommended changes and resubmit to the same journal: This option could well be your top choice if you are keen to publish in a particular journal and if the editor has indicated that they will accept your paper if revisions are made. If the editor has issued an outright rejection and does not wish to ...

WebNov 5, 2012 · The associate editor makes one of four recommendations for publication: accept, accept with minor revisions, major revisions required with no guarantee of acceptance, and reject. The associate editor makes a recommendation to the editor for a … WebMar 13, 2024 · Minor revision: The paper is almost accepted. Only a few minor changes or clarifications are needed. Receiving this output from good journals is very rare. It happens in less than 10% of submissions. Major revision: The paper could be accepted after some significant changes. This means it’s going to be a second round of revision.

WebMinor revision. The paper will be ready for publication after light revisions. Please list the revisions you would recommend the author makes. Major revision. The paper needs substantial changes such as expanded data analysis, widening of the literature review, or rewriting sections of the text. Reject. The paper isn’t suitable for ...

WebMinor revisions and major revisions are the two most common editorial decisions after peer review. A decision of minor revisions means your work will likely not be going back to the original peer reviewers for another round of comments. This is actually a policy for many journals. Do the revisions and resubmit. earth live from space nasaWebApr 14, 2024 · Track: Rhythm Guitar - Distortion GuitarDifficulty (Rhythm):Revised on: 4/14/2024. Request official audio. SPEED 100%. earth live proWebNo, minor revision doesn't mean accepted with minor revisions. Strictly speaking, for truly minor revisions, it's possible that the editor accepts your paper and leaves you to make the remaining changes during proofs. Since the editor didn't do this, it's still possible your … cthulhu vs leviathanWebIn other words, if you receive such a revised manuscript for review, you should make either a recommendation to accept (possibly with a minor revision) or reject with no further … cthulhu vs siren headWebJan 8, 2014 · First, if you agree with the reviewer, you should do exactly what the reviewer ask you to do, and mention that you have done it. Then the reviewer should be happy. Second, you can disagree with the reviewer and explain why you disagree. In this case, you only need to explain why you disagree. But you need to explain well why. cthulhu wall hangingWebIf recommending revision, state specific changes you feel need to be made. The author can then reply to each point in turn. Some journals offer the option to recommend rejection … cthulhu video game sinking cityWebThe first read-through is a skim-read. It will help you form an initial impression of the paper and get a sense of whether your eventual recommendation will be to accept or reject the paper. First Read Considerations Keep a pen and paper handy when skim-reading. cthulhu wars bag storage